OUR SOLUTIONS

One platform.
Starting with medicines.

Datavive is building automated, clinician-led workflows for routine primary-care work. Here is more detail on two of our solutions, which tackle medicines workload from both directions: respond to repeat requests with the relevant checks prepared, and proactively find monitoring gaps before the next medicine review is due.

Book a Demo Clinician remains the final decision-maker
USE CASE 01ReactiveRequest arrives → assess → prepare for sign-off
USE CASE 02ProactiveReview approaching → check → prepare follow-up
USE CASE 01 / REACTIVE RE-AUTHORISATION

When a repeat-medicine request arrives, see the relevant checks in one place.

Today, a clinician may need to check medicines, investigation results, monitoring intervals and prior actions across different parts of the record. Datavive prepares the relevant information and highlights the appropriate next step.

ILLUSTRATIVE VIEW · SYNTHETIC DATA
MEDICINE MANAGEMENT / RE-AUTHORISATION
Request review
Clinician sign-off required
REQUESTLisinopril 10 mgRepeat-medicine request
MONITORINGUrea & electrolytesLast result outside review window
Linked investigations
CheckLast recordedFlag
U&EPrevious resultDue
eGFRPrevious resultReview
Datavive assessment
Monitoring requires attention

Required monitoring appears out of date for this request. Prepare follow-up and refer to the clinician.

Prepared next step Request updated tests
CLINICAL DECISIONClinician reviews the evidence and makes the final decision
Review informationClinician action

Illustrative interface showing a repeat-medicine request, linked monitoring and a prepared action for clinician review. Synthetic data.

  1. Receive requestRepeat-medicine task arrives
  2. Check evidenceMedication, results and review dates
  3. Prepare actionFlag missing monitoring or exceptions
  4. Clinician decidesFinal prescribing sign-off
USE CASE 02 / PROACTIVE MEDICINES MONITORING

Identify what needs doing before a medicine comes up for review.

Instead of waiting for a renewal task to reveal an overdue test, Datavive is designed to assess upcoming review dates and monitoring requirements across repeat medicines, then prepare the necessary follow-up.

ILLUSTRATIVE VIEW · SYNTHETIC DATA
MEDICINES MONITORING / PROACTIVE REVIEW
Upcoming reviews
Prepared for practice team
VIEWUpcomingRepeat medicine reviews
PRIORITYMonitoring gapsTests or checks to arrange
NEXT STEPFollow-upReview before renewal
Proactive medicines-monitoring list
RecordReviewMonitoringPrepared action
Example ADue soonU&E overdueRequest test
Example BDue soonCurrentPrepare review
Example CApproachingResults missingFollow up
IdentifyUpcoming reviews
CheckMonitoring evidence
PrepareRecall and review

Illustrative proactive-monitoring interface using synthetic example records.

  1. Scan upcoming reviewsLook ahead across repeat medicines
  2. Check monitoringFind tests due or overdue
  3. Prepare follow-upTest reminders and review actions
  4. Support review readinessRelevant information ready in time
ONE VIEW OF BOTH WORKFLOWS

See where every request and review stands.

An illustrative overview of how Datavive is designed to summarise both workflows: prepared re-authorisation outcomes and upcoming review follow-up, ready for clinician review.

ILLUSTRATIVE VIEW · SYNTHETIC DATA
MEDICINES WORKFLOW / OVERVIEW
Both workflows
Example data · not live results
USE CASE 01Re-authorisationRequests prepared for review
USE CASE 02Proactive monitoringUpcoming reviews checked
DECISIONClinician sign-offEvery prepared item
Use case 1 · Re-authorisation outcomes
Outcome groupPrepared next stepExample
Ready for clinician approvalEvidence summary prepared12
Clinician review advisedFlagged for closer review5
Updated tests to requestTest request prepared4
Results need clinician reviewResults highlighted3
Outside automated scopePassed to clinician2
Use case 2 · Proactive review log
StagePrepared next stepExample
IdentifyReviews coming due18
CheckMonitoring gaps found7
PrepareFollow-up prepared7
Clinician reviewAwaiting sign-off4
CLINICAL DECISIONClinician reviews each prepared item and makes the final decision
Review queueClinician action

Illustrative overview using synthetic example data. Counts are examples, not live results.

ONE CLINICAL WORKFLOW LAYER

What connects the two use cases?

Designed to bring a structured approach to medication checks, agreed protocols, prepared actions and a traceable review process.

Relevant patient information

Collate medication details, linked investigations and review information.

Protocol-driven checks

Apply agreed monitoring requirements to identify what needs attention.

Prepared next steps

Support patient-contact, missing-test and clinician-review workflows.

Clinician oversight

Present information for qualified clinicians to review, approve or reject.

Designed to work with existing GP systems. EMIS is the intended first integration target, with wider system support planned. Integration, clinical safety and deployment arrangements require appropriate validation and approvals.
WHAT’S TO FOLLOW

The same approach, applied across primary care.

Our ambition is to remove the administrative burden clinicians face day to day, through automated workflows and advanced monitoring supported by machine learning and AI. Beyond medicines, we plan to apply the same clinician-led approach to other protocol-driven tasks.

  • PLANNED

    Annual diabetes reviews

    Prepare the checks and follow-up needed ahead of annual diabetes reviews.

  • PLANNED

    Hypertension monitoring

    Track blood-pressure monitoring and flag patients due or overdue for review.

  • PLANNED

    Asthma reviews

    Organise the information and follow-up needed for routine asthma reviews.

  • PLANNED

    Chronic kidney disease monitoring

    Surface kidney-function monitoring gaps and prepare the next step.

  • PLANNED

    AI-supported medicines insights

    Machine learning to help clinicians consider alternative medicines based on patterns in results.

  • PLANNED

    Discharge letter processing

    Reduce the manual handling of incoming discharge letters.

  • PLANNED

    QOF analysis

    Identify incomplete monitoring and clinical coding relevant to QOF requirements.

Planned workflows are in development and not yet available. Clinicians remain the final decision-makers.

NEXT STEP

See the reactive and proactive workflows in action.

See how the two medicines workflows are designed to support your practice.

Book a Demo